The chairs have the final say, not a monopoly on making observations. The editor role *is* to distill wg discussion onto proposed changes. So saying I have no intention on making changes is clearly within my authority and the chair have the right to override that call.
EHL On Sep 6, 2011, at 17:13, "Melinda Shore" <melinda.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/06/2011 04:09 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: >> Wg consensus is clearly to do nothing here. > > ?? No, it clearly is not, unless you're laboring > under the misconception that "consensus" means "voting." > At any rate the job of calling consensus *explicitly* > belongs to working group chairs, not editors. > > Melinda _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
