> -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Igor Faynberg > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:49 AM > To: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft 20 last call comment (Resource Owner > Impersonation) > > >This text has been proposed by 2 WG members (Niv and me), and reviewed > by 3 others (Phil, Tony,>Barry) and all agree with it. > > Maybe my e-mail was lost, but I was and still am among those who have > agreed with the text, as I am sure many others have
Fantastic! Now explain it to me. > What is also important is that no one has objected. > > I see neither the reason nor the right of an editor to remove the text. Nothing was *removed* - it wasn't even rejected. It is simply held back to allow additional discussion and it is clearly within the role of editor. EHL _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
