I would still like to see a binding of this to use query or form parameters. I have a direct use case for handing out signed URLs to the client, for which we're using the OAuth 1.0 signing mechanism without tokens today. I'd love to switch to something that we could bind to OAuth2, but the restriction of using the Auth header puts the MAC token out of reach for my immediate usecase.

 -- Justin

On 5/9/2011 3:22 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

(Please discuss this draft on the Apps-Discuss <apps-disc...@ietf.org> mailing list)

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth-v2-mac-token

The draft includes:

* An HTTP authentication scheme using a MAC algorithm to authenticate requests (via a pre-arranged MAC key).

* An extension to the Set-Cookie header, providing a method for associating a MAC key with a session cookie.

* An OAuth 2.0 binding, providing a method of returning MAC credentials as an access token.

Some background: OAuth 1.0 introduced an HTTP authentication scheme using HMAC for authenticating an HTTP request with partial cryptographic protection of the HTTP request (namely, the request URI, host, and port). The OAuth 1.0 scheme was designed for delegation-based use cases, but is widely “abused” for simple client-server authentication (the poorly named ‘two-legged’ use case). This functionality has been separated from OAuth 2.0 and has been reintroduced as a standalone, generally applicable HTTP authentication scheme called MAC.

Comments and feedback is greatly appreciated.

EHL


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to