I propose that we close issue #12 (Restore WWW-Authenticate response to the framework specification) with no action, that is each extension would handle as they are doing now.
-----Original Message----- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:05 AM To: OAuth WG Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Closing a few issues There are three issues in the tracker that are just looking for consensus on text that's in the document -- Eran had flagged them as "pending consensus" in the -15 version. Let's look at closing those issues now. The issues are #8 4.1.2.1 and 4.2.2.1, text for 4xx or 5xx HTTP status code http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/ticket/8 #9 5.2, text for non-400 & 401 error conditions http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/ticket/9 #10 8.4. Defining Additional Error Codes http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/ticket/10 I think these are non-controversial. I'm aware of some conversation about perhaps tweaking the text to make sure it's clear what layer the status codes go into (for the redirects, it should be clear, but a slight text change might help). Everyone, please review these. They are short, and should be easy to confirm consensus on. Please post any objection you have to closing these issues. If you do have an objection, it would help if you could post alternative text that you'd be happy with. Please post also if you think they're OK and ready to close. I will close these issues next Friday, 6 May, if there are no unresolved objections. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
