Yeah, 4/1 and it gives people the chance to express their views at the meeting.
It's a draft... which is the way this WG has been more effective in getting people's attentions to proposal. I'll include it in -14 and take it out if we have another solution or lack of consensus when I do -15 with the first security consideration section. EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im] > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 5:27 PM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: OAuth WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error extensibility proposal > > On 3/30/11 1:01 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > > Please send any feedback, comments, support, and objections by 3/1 > > I think you meant 4/1. :) > > > (so it can be included or not in -14). > > Given how busy things are during IETF week, I'm sure that many people > who are in Prague for the meeting might not have time to review the > proposal in 48 hours or less. I know I won't have time to double-check > the list threads and document history on this point until next week. > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
