On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt
<tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> looks even better now :-)
>
> As already pointed out
> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg05599.html), "Have
> client credentials? No" does not automatically imply usage of implicit
> grant. The client could also use the authorization code (for various
> reasons).

+1, no client credentials does not necessarily imply the implicit grant.

Marius
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to