On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt <tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > looks even better now :-) > > As already pointed out > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg05599.html), "Have > client credentials? No" does not automatically imply usage of implicit > grant. The client could also use the authorization code (for various > reasons).
+1, no client credentials does not necessarily imply the implicit grant. Marius _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth