Hi Mike, Hi all, As some of you had notice we do not vote. Soliciting the feedback from the working group on this issue is, however, a good idea.
Ciao Hannes On Mar 12, 2011, at 1:04 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth > Errors Registry to increase interoperability among implementations using the > related OAuth specifications. As you also know, there has been some > discussion about whether: > > A) The OAuth Errors Registry belongs in in the Framework specification > rather than the bearer token specification, > B) The OAuth Errors Registry should continue to be defined in the Bearer > Token specification and apply to all OAuth specifications, > C) The OAuth Errors Registry should reside in the Bearer Token specification > but be scoped back to only apply to that specification, or > D) The OAuth Errors Registry should be deleted because the set of errors > should not be extensible. > > Please vote for A, B, C, or D by Friday, March 18th. > > I personally believe that A makes the most sense, but given that other points > of view have also been voiced, this consensus call is needed to resolve the > issue. > > Cheers, > -- Mike > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
