Marius, did you have an alternative to suggest for this? Not that it has to be in the spec, but it would be nice to have a best practice for this as it's a common case.
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran at hueniverse.com> > wrote: > > -12 3.1.1: > > > > The redirection URI MUST be an absolute URI and MAY include a query > > component, which MUST be retained by the authorization server when > > adding additional query parameters. > > > > 'oob' is not an absolute URI. > > Good point, I missed the absolute part. Thanks for pointing this out. > > Let me think about it, the URN you suggested is a good start. > > Marius > > From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:mscurtescu at google.com] > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 10:07 AM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: Skylar Woodward; OAuth WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav > <eran at hueniverse.com> wrote: > > Why not: > > > > urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
