Please change the draft to use a different scheme name than 'OAuth2' for the bearer token authentication scheme. Given the unstable state of the header (still is), it is perfectly fine to make this change. The list includes a detailed discussion about this. I am strongly opposed to giving the bearer token scheme a name giving it the appearance of the preferred or canonical token authentication method. I don't care what you change it to as long as it is not 'OAuth2' or 'OAuth'.
EHL
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
