Yes, that's correct, as HTTP adopts the definition of 'absoluteURI' from the 
URI specification itself. It's just in the protocol itself that fragments are 
not sent.

>From RFC2616: "This specification adopts the definitions of "URI-reference", 
>"absoluteURI", "relativeURI", "port", "host","abs_path", "rel_path", and 
>"authority" from that specification" (where 'that' refers to RFC2396). It then 
>proceeds to restrict URIs used in the HTTP scheme itself as being:

http:" "//" host [ ":" port ] [ abs_path [ "?" query ]]

Fragments are not valid in the protocol itself, but they often are elsewhere 
(depending on the usage, and which specifications apply). As Eran says, they 
are perfectly valid in a Location HTTP header.

Regards,

- johnk

On Aug 3, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

> Fragments are perfectly valid in the Location header URI:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-10#section-9.4
> 
> EHL
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Oleg Gryb
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:34 AM
>> To: John Kemp; Brian Eaton
>> Cc: oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Is User Agent Profile Secure in OAuth 2.0?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: John Kemp <j...@jkemp.net>
>>> To: Brian Eaton <bea...@google.com>
>>> Cc: o...@gryb.info; oauth@ietf.org
>>> Sent: Tue, August 3, 2010 10:24:19 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Is User Agent Profile Secure in OAuth 2.0?
>>> HTTP URIs should not, when  participating in the HTTP protocol, send
>>> the fragment, as this is not included  in HTTP implementation parsing
>>> of the URI (according to the  specification).
>> 
>> That's interesting, so if somebody puts a fragment to Location header, which
>> is a part of HTTP protocol, it will be a violation of the protocol and can be
>> considered as a server side bug?
>> 
>> See 14.2 in http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html.
>> 
>> 
>> Location       = "Location" ":" absoluteURI
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to