There are many cases where we need to have more than 1 SAML assertion be used to represent the authorization token, so would want a provision for multiple SAML tokens and not sure it makes sense to have a separate profile for that or add it as an option here.
-----Original Message----- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 1:50 PM To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profile for OAuth 2.0 draft I'm gong to join the growing list of people attaching a potential I-D to an email due to he cut off time for the I-D submissions. Attached is a draft that aims to tightly define the particular format of a SAML 2.0 bearer assertion in requesting an access token using the assertion grant_type. I've been working with Chuck at Salesforce.com on this and the primary goal is to have some documentation or specification that is sufficient to facilitate interoperability between independently developed implementations or products. This, of course, wouldn't preclude using SAML in other ways - it would only provide one concrete definition to implement against. I intend to submit this as an I-D when the submission process reopens. Any feedback from this group would be appreciated as well as thoughts about this eventually becoming a working group draft. Thanks, Brian Campbell _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
