No according to WG consensus. We took it all out because too many people 
considered it experimental, so while it may be a WG item, it is not part of the 
core spes.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Torsten Lodderstedt [mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 1:07 PM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Extensibility: new endpoints
> 
> and discovery does not belong into the core?
> 
> regards,
> Torsten.
> 
> Am 02.08.2010 22:05, schrieb Eran Hammer-Lahav:
> > This doesn't belong in core. A registry is used to avoid name collisions, 
> > not
> to provide an inventory.
> >
> > Maybe  in discovery.
> >
> > EHL
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Torsten Lodderstedt
> >> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 12:54 PM
> >> To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> >> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Extensibility: new endpoints
> >>
> >> the existing authorization server endpoints (end-user authorization
> >> and tokens endpoint) have a relatively clearly semantics and scope.
> >> Adding distinct new functions to an authorization server will (in my
> >> opionion) require the definition of new endpoints. For example, I'm
> >> working on an I-D for token revocation. Such a function does not fit
> >> into the tokens endpoint since it has become a "token issuance
> >> endpoint" rather than a general purpose client2server endpoint.
> >>
> >> I therefore would propose to include the option to define and
> >> register new endpoints into the Extensibility section of the spec.
> >> This would also facilitate the incorporation of additional endpoints
> >> (with well-defined names) into OAuth discovery.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Torsten.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OAuth mailing list
> >> OAuth@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >>

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to