I've always found "client password" to be a confusing term.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Brian Eaton <bea...@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Brian Campbell > <bcampb...@pingidentity.com> wrote: > > +1 for something different but not "client password" as sounds like it > > would preclude other methods of client authentication > > I think it would work like this: > > grant_type=client_password: > maps to the "client password flow" from > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardt-oauth-01#page-13. > > grant_type=client_assertion > maps to the "client assertion" profile > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardt-oauth-01#section-5.2 > > Cheers, > Brian > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
