My post was a reply to http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg03639.html. (Something obviously went wrong with the Thread Index.)
Regards, Christian > Torsten, > > I came across your I-D when looking for a way to distinguish between > different protected resources. > > Just some remarks and questions: > o In 3.1. I suppose your example request is missing the service_id, right? > o 3.4. Replace server_id by service_id and you comply with the rest of the > document. > > After all, your approach seems feasible but overly complicated to me. I > wouldn't want different 'modes' in the protocol and think we should go the > whole way by only offering the 'multiple tokens mode'. In single service > environments one could simply define one single service but still use > mechanisms capable of supporting multiple service. Don't you think? > > However I'm much in favor of the idea to support multiple PRs. If the > others decide your I-D is the way to go - I'm fine with it. > > Regard, > Christian > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
