+1 (JSON in direct response, separate discussion on redirect response) On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Brian Eaton <bea...@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <e...@hueniverse.com> > wrote: > > So far we have 16 people supporting using JSON as the only response > format > > for the token endpoint with no objections. Draft -07 reflects this > change. I am > > considering this matter closed, but if someone has a late objection, feel > free to raise it. > > > > As for using JSON in the fragment or query of the end-user authorization > > endpoint response, two people voiced specific objections to that. For > now, > > -07 contains an editorial note about that option (using JSON). I think it > is > > worth further (separate) discussion. > > Sounds good to me. > > (I completely missed that the proposal was to use JSON in redirect > URLs. Evan, thanks for catching that, and Eran, thanks for flagging > it as something that requires more discussion.) > > Cheers, > Brian > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
