On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt <tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote: > >> >> Sure, to give one example, I would make the device flow a separate >> spec immediately. That seems only distantly related to other things in >> the spec, and may not be really necessary by the time the standard >> matures. >> > > Why does this hold for the device flow and not for other flows? For us > (Deutsche Telekom), the device flow is one of the most important pieces of > the spec since we want to use OAuth for a variety of autonomous devices with > limited input capabilities (Set Top Boxes, TV Sets, handsets, ....).
I'm not saying the use case is invalid. Are you saying Deutsche Telekom can't implement the device flow if it is not finalized at precisely the same time as the other parts of OAuth? -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time." _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
