Hi all guys, Paul very nice to meet you :) at the era I started writing the first version of the Amber proposal, my Cocoon3 mates Reinhard Poetz and Steven Dolg were interested, I'll ping them to get them involved. Quick question: can anyone tell me please where I can share the first draft of the proposal? Thanks in advance! Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Simone Gianni <simo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Paul, > yes, we have 3 Apache people (me, you, Simone Tripodi), one Apache > contributor with filed CLA (Pid) that want to contribute his code base, and > received some interest from other people, so I think we could start > preparing an Incubator proposal. You can have a look at Simone Tripodi's > proposal for the Amber lab that can be a good starting point. > > Anyone else on OAuth list is interested? > > Simone > > 2010/4/21 Paul Lindner <lind...@inuus.com> >> >> Ditto here. Apache Shindig uses OAuth extensively and we would like to >> upgrade it to OAuth 2.0. The current stable java oauth library is okay, but >> does not have an active developer community, and isn't even published to >> maven central. >> I just had a peek at Amber, looks fairly decent. I can help move this to >> Apache incubating if people are interested. >> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Simone Gianni <simo...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Pid, >>> I'm also interested in developing a Java library for OAuth 2. There is an >>> Apache Lab (labs.apache.org , lab named Amber) working on an OAuth 1 Java >>> API, it could (will) eventually move to Incubator if we manage to get enough >>> momentum. >>> >>> It would be nice to have a Java API that integrates with existing >>> systems, like JAAS and Spring Security (formerly known as Acegi). That would >>> ease the migration for all the frameworks and existing systems that already >>> use those libraries. >>> >>> Simone >>> >>> 2010/4/15 Pid <p...@pidster.com> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'm interested in working with other Java programmers to develop a >>>> standardised API for OAuth 2.0. >>>> >>>> I have reviewed the recent archives, but don't see anything in the way >>>> of discussion on this topic. If anyone can point me to a location where >>>> it is being discussed I'd be grateful. >>>> >>>> >>>> I think it would be good if the OAuth community was able to agree a spec >>>> and then for implementors to have something to focus their efforts >>>> against, instead of produced many different and incompatible libraries. >>>> >>>> There are obviously challenges in attempting this before the v2.0 itself >>>> is final, but perhaps the effort will inform the overall debate. >>>> >>>> >>>> The different Java implementations of OAuth version 1.0 each have >>>> varying features and levels of complexity. Most implementations focus >>>> on the client component and don't provide server components at all. >>>> I'd like to improve on that in a Java API. >>>> >>>> Some ideas I have include specifying that, in addition to programmatical >>>> configuration, an implementation should allow ServiceLoader and XML >>>> based configurations, and perhaps even an Annotation based config. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'd like to hear from anyone who'd be interested in combining efforts, >>>> Java programmer or not. >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> >>>> Pid >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OAuth mailing list >>>> OAuth@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
