I'm indetermined. Using JSON exclusively instead of form encoded parameters would give us the possibility to use structured parameters (in and outbound) instead of a flat parameter list, which I would like very much. But there are propably use cases where form encoded parameters are better suited.

regards,
Torsten.

Am 21.04.2010 02:04, schrieb Manger, James H:

+1 to JSON as the one and only response format.

It is common enough. It is simple enough. It is flexible enough. It is unambiguously specified enough.

I suggested a structure in the “application/credentials” thread.

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg01920.html

--

James Manger


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to