I trust your experience here, so +1.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <e...@hueniverse.com> wrote: > Given the current proposal for signatures (no parsing of the request URI or > body, or any encoding), I would like to proposal that the spec remains mute > on the allowed parameter values. > > While it is best to issue values that do not require any encoding (or > decoding when receiving a token response), encoding and decoding > form-encoded parameter is trivial and provided automatically by every > platform. > > The only issues with encoding in 1.0a related to signatures and the > production of the base string. This is no longer an issue. > > Proposal: close issue without further action. > > EHL > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
