Was there early discussion that had much of the work in the ProblemReporting extension included for 2.0?
http://wiki.oauth.net/ProblemReporting On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Chris Messina <chris.mess...@gmail.com>wrote: > We've had this page on the wiki for some time... perhaps it could be > updated to actually offer all the appropriate error codes (including those > from HTTP) that are relevant? > > http://wiki.oauth.net/ErrorCases > > Chris > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:56 AM, David Recordon <record...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> In drafting OAuth 2.0 I removed a lot of the error codes throughout >> the flows and in this draft encouraged people to use HTTP status codes >> (like 1.0a does). I've heard the feedback from multiple people that >> they'd like more specific error codes than what can be expressed in >> HTTP. I'd like to use this thread – or ideally a wiki page that >> someone creates – to build consensus around the error codes needed >> throughout protocol responses. >> >> Is someone willing to take the lead on this? http://wiki.oauth.net/ >> should be easy enough to create a new page on. >> >> Thanks, >> --David >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > > > > -- > Chris Messina > Open Web Advocate, Google > > Personal: http://factoryjoe.com > Follow me on Buzz: http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina > ...or Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina > > This email is: [ ] shareable [X] ask first [ ] private > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
