It would be great to have a discussion about how people would like to move forward given that we don't yet have consensus on which drafts to use. We now have 3 alternatives but practically no discussion. I am ready to put in editorial work but I don't know how the WG wants to proceed.
EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Blaine Cook > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 6:18 AM > To: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed agenda for third interim meeting > > Hi all, > > Below is a very rough agenda for Thursday's interim meeting. Your feedback > is very welcome to improve this agenda, either on the list or during the > meeting ("agenda bashing"). > > Peter and I have included a request for a scribe; if anyone would like to > volunteer beforehand, we'd be very grateful as it will maximize our time on > the call. > > The logistics are available here: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg01166.html - > Please note the time, which is earlier than the last call, at 18:30 GMT, 10:30 > PST, and 13:30 EST. > > ***** > > AGENDA > > * Intro > * NOTE WELL > * request for a scribe > > * Agenda bashing > > * Chair announcements > * impending Area Director change > * wiki pages (use cases, terminology) > * call for agenda items at Anaheim meeting > > * Continuation of "use a token" discussion > > * Continuation of use case discussion > > * Scheduling of next interim meeting > > * Other business? > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
