https://jclouds.apache.org/start/blobstore/

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:43 PM Amit Jain <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't have too much details but jclouds has some modules to persist to
> filesystem and memory with the same API they have for other cloud backends.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:38 PM Michael Dürig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I wonder how other communities address such issues. I.e. Apache jclouds
>> would need to be tested against a rather broad variety of different
>> cloud vendors. Maybe its worth to do some research on their approach.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> On 31.07.18 10:01, Amit Jain wrote:
>> > There's one provided by Adobe as well - https://github.com/adobe/S3Mock
>> > But these would have to be enhanced to support the upload/download urls
>> > which I don't think these support. Also, I am not aware of any similar
>> > utility for Azure.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Amit
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:24 PM Julian Reschke <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2018-07-30 19:26, Matt Ryan wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Oak now has a fair few cloud-based modules - meaning, modules that
>> enable
>> >>> Oak to make use of cloud service provider capabilities in order for
>> the
>> >>> feature to work - among them being oak-blob-cloud,
>> oak-blob-cloud-azure,
>> >>> and oak-segment-azure.
>> >>>
>> >>> I’m not as familiar with oak-segment-azure, but I do know for
>> >>> oak-blob-cloud and oak-blob-cloud-azure you need an environment set
>> up to
>> >>> run the tests including credentials for the corresponding cloud
>> service
>> >>> provider.  The consequence of this is that there is no regular CI
>> testing
>> >>> run on these modules, IIUC.
>> >>>
>> >>> I wanted to kick off a discussion to see what everyone else thinks.  I
>> >>> think coming up with some form of mock for the cloud objects might be
>> >> nice,
>> >>> or even better to use existing Apache-license-friendly ones if there
>> are
>> >>> some, but maybe others have already gone down this road further or
>> have
>> >>> better ideas?
>> >>> ...
>> >>
>> >> FWIW; this has been concerning me as well for quite some time.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe it's worth trying out <https://github.com/findify/s3mock>?
>> >>
>> >> Best regards, Julian
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to