Is there any reason I'd see:

2018-03-15 21:48:54.673  INFO 20475 --- [ex-update-async]
o.a.j.oak.plugins.index.IndexUpdate      : Incremental indexing Traversed
#10000 /NJ Foreclosure/342CKA-IANWK/SCRA SEARCHES-AAMZG/
FRCL201604PTI00003XEGT-20160425-4351400/jcr:content [Infinity nodes/s,
Infinity nodes/hr]

...regularly at the outset, but it stops appearing after a certain point?

If I take a thread-dump after it starts slowing down, I see the worker
threads (usually all but one once slow-down starts) parked at:

"pool-5-thread-3" #25772 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x000000000201e000 nid=0xc0c0
waiting on condition [0x00007f42486cc000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for  <0x00000004c1327098> (a
java.util.concurrent.Semaphore$FairSync)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:836)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:997)
at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1304)
at java.util.concurrent.Semaphore.acquire(Semaphore.java:312)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.scheduler.LockBasedScheduler.schedule(LockBasedScheduler.java:217)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.SegmentNodeStore.merge(SegmentNodeStore.java:195)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.MutableRoot.commit(MutableRoot.java:248)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.commit(SessionDelegate.java:347)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.commit(SessionDelegate.java:360)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.version.ReadWriteVersionManager.checkin(ReadWriteVersionManager.java:129)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.VersionManagerDelegate.checkin(VersionManagerDelegate.java:67)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.version.VersionManagerImpl$7.perform(VersionManagerImpl.java:371)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.version.VersionManagerImpl$7.perform(VersionManagerImpl.java:362)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.perform(SessionDelegate.java:208)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.version.VersionManagerImpl.checkin(VersionManagerImpl.java:362)


When I'm inserting documents at the very beginning (no content yet), the
individual threads don't park at that state for nearly as long...



On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Julian Reschke <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 2018-03-16 16:46, William Markmann wrote:
>
>> Folders are: *org.apache.jackrabbit.JcrConstants.NT_FOLDER*
>> Documents are:
>>
>>                  Binary fileBinary = 
>> session.getValueFactory().createBinary(new
>> ByteArrayInputStream(data));
>>                  Node newFile = parentNode.addNode(filename,
>> *JcrConstants.NT_FILE*);
>>                  newFile.addMixin(*JcrConstants.MIX_VERSIONABLE*);
>>                  Node docContents = 
>> newFile.addNode(*JcrConstants.JCR_CONTENT*,
>> *JcrConstants.NT_RESOURCE*);
>>                  // docContents.setProperty(JcrConstants.JCR_MIMETYPE,
>> getMimeType(filename, getFileExtension(filename)));
>>                  docContents.setProperty(JcrConstants.JCR_MIMETYPE,
>> FileUtils.getMimeType(FileUtils.getFileExtension(filename)));
>>                  docContents.setProperty(JcrConstants.JCR_ENCODING, "");
>>                  docContents.setProperty(JcrConstants.JCR_DATA,
>> fileBinary);
>>
>> Is there a better choice?
>> ...
>>
>
> I was worried the folder might have "orderable" child nodes, which creates
> a significant overhead. But AFAIR that is not the case for nt:folder (but
> you may want to check).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> PS: I wouldn't set JCR_ENCODING if that information isn't present.
>



-- 
*Bill Markmann*
*President | 866 809 0394 x 701*
*Counterpoint Consulting*
*Automate. Innovate. Accelerate.*
c20g.com | *Blog <http://www.c20g.com/site/blog> **| Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/counterpoint-consulting-inc.>** | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/c20g>*

Reply via email to