On Tuesday 13 February 2018 12:03:34 Robert Munteanu wrote: > Hi, Hi,
> In OAK-7203 [1] we're discussing the best location for the > MountInfoProviderService. The context is that due to the addition of > the mounts concept a MountInfoProvider implementation is required and > for OSGi deployment we have to add oak-store-composite. > > There are two options here: > > 1. Move the service to oak-core. > 2. Require oak-store-composite for deployments > > If we go with 1, we have simpler deployments ( one less bundle ). If we > go with 2, we split the logic from the oak-store-composite bundle and > add more stuff on top of oak-core. 1 means simpler deployment and more stuff in oak-core, but the MountInfoProvider is required for composite and non-composite stores. Having it in (experimental) module oak-store-composite feels strange. Regards, O. > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > > Robert > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7203
