I would rather a post about a rarity even if it turns out later not to be so. I
am sure we all learned a bit more about Dunlin and Curlew Sandpipers. Nothing
to be embarrassed about, you made the call and handled it well regardless of
the outcome.
Cheers,
--------
"I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of
others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence." ~ Frederick
Douglass
風 Swift as the wind
林 Quiet as the forest
火 Conquer like the fire
山 Steady as the mountain
Sun Tzu The Art of War
> (\__/)
> (= '.'=)
> (") _ (")
> Sent from somewhere in the field using my mobile device!
Andrew Baksh
www.birdingdude.blogspot.com
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Arie Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In a recent post it was said “Shorebirds are not easy.” Yep.
>
> I’ll admit to a modicum of embarrassment at getting this ID wrong. Having
> said so, multiple field guides refer to a field mark of white rump, which I
> saw well, but upon which I apparently placed undeserved weight. Well if you
> can't trust a field guide...
>
> Of course with a potential rarity the question becomes does one wait until
> you are > 100% certain, or do you get the info out right away. Some said
> parse the post with caveats such as “possible” or other pull-backs; Its just
> that at the time everyone present concurred on the ID. Doesn't excuse the
> animus.
>
> In other posts, the age, overall shape, and molt have been suggested as
> taking precedence over what I heretofore felt is an 'obvious' field mark,
> *if* seen well. Those other elements require far greater study IMHO though.
>
> A reference web page was proffered regarding this “ID Challenge”. Careless
> readers, perhaps including myself, might stop at the top of the page where it
> states that a previous instance was ultimately decided because of, wait for
> it, the white rump!
>
> The page contains valuable information though arguably as explained above,
> interjects a bit of confusion.
>
> Hopefully, an actual Curlew Sandpiper will show up and more hopefully, I will
> be the one to find it ( and correctly ID it )
>
> In that event, be on the lookout for a posting where the species listed is
> 'Wolf' <g>
>
> Arie
>
> North Babylon, NY
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
>
>
> --
>
> NYSbirds-L List Info:
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
> http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
>
> ARCHIVES:
> 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
> 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
> 3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
>
> Please submit your observations to eBird:
> http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
>
> --
--
NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01
Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
--