Thanks, Peter, for sharing this.

Although the original hard copy of the article is right here on my shelf, I 
remembered it only dimly until you posted the link.

Among the many characters discussed by the authors are two that I'd like to 
follow up on now, while everything is fresh in our minds. The first involves 
the pattern of the secondary coverts, which in Brewer's Sparrow are described 
as showing pointed black extensions along the shafts, described as absent in 
Clay-colored Sparrow. I had noticed that the Queens bird showed such points, 
and worried about this a little bit until I confirmed that multiple of my 
images of Long Island Clay-colored Sparrows also clearly show this pattern:

https://picasaweb.google.com/109808209543611018404/Spizella#

I don't have an explanation for this discrepancy, but it underscores the need 
to look at multiple characters when trying to distinguish very similar species.

The second involves the relative tail length character mentioned in a number of 
posts. Whereas the article does not mention this as a useful field character 
for distinguishing Brewer's and Clay-colored, it is well known that these two 
species collectively differ from Chipping in being longer-tailed, relative to 
body size. This may not be immediately obvious from the table of measurements, 
because the tail length values for Chipping Sparrow are basically identical to 
those for Brewer's and Clay-colored. But the key point is that Chipping Sparrow 
is larger than the other two, as seen most obviously in its much greater wing 
length values. Thus, what might appear to be an obscure bander's formula, "wing 
minus tail" is in fact an elegant way of expressing relative tail length, and 
it is evident from the table that Brewer's and Clay-colored are similarly 
long-tailed compared to Chipping.

Using wing length as a proxy for body size is appealing because these data are 
relatively accessible, but the validity of this approach is restricted to 
closely related species that have similar wing shapes. In the case of the 
Spizella sparrows, I think this is generally true. If anything, I think 
Chipping might be a little be longer-winged (relative to body size) than the 
other two, with a slightly longer primary projection, but I still think 
Clay-colored looks consistently longer-tailed than Chipping in the field and 
suspect that Brewer's does also.

Shai Mitra
Bay Shore
________________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] on behalf of Peter Reisfeld 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 12:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [nysbirds-l] Spizella sparrows

For those wishing to delve a bit more into this topic, here is an old review 
discussing the range of variation of features within species, and clues to help 
separate them.

http://www.birdpop.org/docs/pubs/Pyle_and_Howell_1996_Spizella_Sparrows_Intraspecific_Variation_and_ID.pdf

Happy winter birding,

Peter
--
NYSbirds-L List Info:
Welcome and Basics<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME>
Rules and Information<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES>
Subscribe, Configuration and 
Leave<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm>
Archives:
The Mail 
Archive<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html>
Surfbirds<http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L>
BirdingOnThe.Net<http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NYSB.html>
Please submit your observations to eBird<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/>!
--

________________________________
Support CSI students this holiday season each time you shop with Amazon 
Smile<https://smile.amazon.com/ch/13-3683723>

--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NYSB.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Reply via email to