ShamRack looks *very* interesting, cheers!

On 10 June 2010 23:26, Jon R <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you're looking to "fake" web services I can recommend webmock, as
> ashley mentioned, http://github.com/bblimke/webmock, which can replay
> recorded responses... or... ShamRack, http://github.com/mdub/sham_rack,
> which allows you to ""mount"" rack apps, so you can then write micro
> apps to fake out said service if you desire.
>
> On 10 June, 18:32, doug livesey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Had a bit of a play with it, but couldn't get Merb to play (due to an
> issue
> > with bundler, I think), and didn't get too far with Sinatra before having
> a
> > *facepalm* moment & remembering that it won't store state between calls,
> so
> > I couldn't load up an array of data & have it feed through it.
> > Will crack on tomorrow with it, but the rest of tonight is gonna be band
> > practice, get what I have working into crontab, then bed!
> > Cheers,
> >    Doug.
> >
> > On 10 June 2010 15:58, Caius Durling <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 10 Jun 2010, at 15:12, doug livesey wrote:
> >
> > > > However a little fake web service that simply read pre-recorded or
> > > constructed responses from a local file (or symlink to one of several
> > > potential files) could work.
> > > > Then, in my cuke features, I could say "Given the service will return
> > > typical data" (or whatever), and have the corresponding step make the
> fake
> > > web service's symlink to a file of fixture responses that suit.
> > > > See, I like this idea, which immediately makes me suspicious of it.
> >
> > > I've done something along these lines before.
> >
> > > If a file (tmp/warren.test iirc) existed then the adapter read it and
> > > returned the data in it as a response instead of connecting to the
> service
> > > (RabbitMQ in this case.)
> >
> > > Was to work around running a separate server for cucumber using
> > > culerity/celerity if I remember rightly. Couldn't mock the adapter, but
> > > could have any response returned we wanted to at the time this way.
> >
> > > C
> > > ---
> > > Caius Durling
> > > [email protected]
> > > +44 (0) 7960 268 100
> > >http://caius.name/
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "NWRUG" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<nwrug-members%[email protected]>
> <nwrug-members%2bunsubscr...@goog legroups.com>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NWRUG" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nwrug-members%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NWRUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en.

Reply via email to