None, really -- I guess I'm just after reassurance that I'm not committing some horrendous sin, or being non-compliant with some standard I've been unable to find -- looking for w3c docs, now.
On 4 February 2010 19:11, Will Jessop <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:38 PM, doug livesey <[email protected]> wrote: > > & if there is, is it documented anywhere? > > I'm getting bored of 200, 201, 422, and 500! > > I've not had a problem with using the existing ones, what do you see as > missing? > > Will. > > > -- > Will Jessop > Super Shiny Robot Limited - Professional web design and development > > t: 07939 547 962 > w: http://supershinyrobot.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NWRUG" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<nwrug-members%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en.
