On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Francis Fish <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Last time I looked at summat like this twas a login object you had to > instatiate & populate 1st in order to pass through. This shuld be in > the default.rb. > > SOAP is designed to move complex objects about so parameters tend to > be objects in their own right. The irony of an acronym that *was* 'simple object access protocol' being used for complex objects never ceases to ecape me ;) ... FWIW though it depends entirely on the *type* of web service being called whether not it its complex objects or sets of objects, i.e. whether its rpc-literal, rpc-literal-encoded or document-literal, or document-literal wrapped etc ;) > > > Ruby -d willl populate the $DEBUG global and give you what Ruby's > sending down the wire. Never needed the proxies or that stuff & I must > have written 10 or so clients in my last job. Ahh I'd forgotten -d yes that would be a lot simpler than the proxy'ing approach, I'd still recommend first checking you can get things working with SoapUI first, will *generally* save you a lot of time in the long run :) - cj. > > > F > > On Tuesday, July 28, 2009, Ciaran <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, cool. SoapUI is awesome.... If the element in the 'example request' > follows <!--- optional --> then it doesn't need to be supplied, otherwise it > does (this is all predicated on the assumption that the wsdl being exposed > is actually correct..which they often aren't :( ) > > - cj. > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:05 AM, doug livesey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Ah, I'm with you, cheers -- and from playing a little with soapUI, it > looks well useful, and even seems to suggest that there are parameters I > need to be passing that are not in the published API -- for instance, the > API talks about login( username, password ), whereas the xml snippet that > soapUI reveals for login has question marks for username, password, company > id, etc. > > So I guess I'll experiment with the driver created, passing different > params & inspecting the results until I'm happy that I'm passing the params > the right way (arrays, whatever, etc.). > > & cheers again for your help, > > > > Doug. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks and regards, > > Francis Fish > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
