Hi Greg, > GIM>> Thank you for the question, Tony. Looking at other Geneve OAM > documents, I propose the following update: > OLD TEXT: > The second case is when a test packet is transmitted using the VNI > value associated with the monitored service flow. By doing that, the > test packet experiences network treatment as the tenant's packets. > Details of that use case are outside the scope of this specification. > NEW TEXT: > The second case is when a test packet is transmitted using the VNI > value associated with the monitored service flow. By doing that, the > test packet experiences network treatment as the tenant's packets. > An example of the realization of that scenario is discussed in > [RFC9521]. > And I now have a question for you Should RFC 9521 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9521/> be used as Normative reference or > it can remain the Informative?
Thank you. I think informative is fine. T
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- nvo3@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to nvo3-le...@ietf.org
