Hi Yingzhen, As a co-author of this Draft I am not aware of any IPR associated with this Draft.
Thanks, Kausik On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 1:02 AM Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry, I have to take this back since we haven't received replies from all > authors on the IPR call yet. > > The draft won't be adopted until all authors have replied to the IPR call. > > My apologies for sending the conclusion email too quickly. > > Thanks, > Yingzhen > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 12:53 AM Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The adoption call is now concluded. There is enough support and no >> objections, so the draft is now adopted. >> >> Authors, please submit the draft as draft-ietf-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan. >> There are a few comments during the adoption call, please address them >> later. >> >> Thanks, >> Yingzhen >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 6:22 PM Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes/Support its adoption. >>> >>> Aijun Wang >>> China Telecom >>> >>> On Apr 11, 2024, at 02:02, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: >>> draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-07 >>> - Multi-segment SD-WAN via Cloud DCs (ietf.org) >>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan/> >>> >>> After the draft was presented at IETF 119, the chairs did a poll of the >>> draft, and here are the questions and results: >>> >>> - "Do you think the multi-segment SD-WAN as described in the draft >>> is a use case that the IETF should work on?" >>> >>> yes: 20 no: 9 no_opinion: 33 total: 84 >>> >>> >>> - "Do you support adoption of this work in RTGWG?" >>> >>> yes: 9 no: 9 no_opinion: 25 total: 92 >>> >>> >>> There is currently one IPR disclosure of this draft: IPR disclosures >>> (ietf.org) >>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan> >>> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of >>> any IPR that applies to the draft. >>> >>> The draft proposes a solution which extends GENEVE, so also copying NVO3 >>> WG. If you don't think the draft should be adopted in RTGWG, please voice >>> your opinion. >>> >>> Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by >>> Apr 26th, 2024. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Yingzhen >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rtgwg mailing list >>> rt...@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rt...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
