This is much better. Thanks for addressing my comments. //Zahed
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 9:25 AM <xiao.m...@zte.com.cn> wrote: > Hi Zaheduzzaman, > > > Thank you for the review and thoughtful comments. > > Please see inline. > Original > *From: *ZaheduzzamanSarkerviaDatatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > *To: *The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; > *Cc: *draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-gen...@ietf.org < > draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-gen...@ietf.org>;nvo3-cha...@ietf.org < > nvo3-cha...@ietf.org>;nvo3@ietf.org <nvo3@ietf.org>; > matthew.bo...@nokia.com <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>;matthew.bo...@nokia.com > <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>; > *Date: *2023年08月07日 21:39 > *Subject: **[nvo3] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on > draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-12: (with COMMENT)* > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Thanks for working on this specification. Special thanks to Magnus Westerlund > > for identifying an important aspect in his TSVART review and I am happy to see > the resolution in the -11 version of this doc. > > > I have stumbled upon similar clarification issues that John has brought up in > > his discuss. It not clear to me how this validation need to be done as written > in Section 5.1 > > Then the UDP destination port and the TTL or Hop Limit of the inner IP > > packet MUST be validated to determine whether the received packet can be > processed by BFD. > > > I was expecting pointers for those validation mechanism special to BFD. Can we > be more clear on this? > > [XM]>>> Yes. A new revision has just been posted, attempting to address > all received comments. Link as below. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-13 > > Please check whether this version clarifies the issue. > > > Best Regards, > > Xiao Min > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > nvo3@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
