Hi Donald, many thanks for your kind words and help in improving the quality of the document. I updated the draft based on your suggestions. Please take a look at the attached diff that highlights the changes. I hope that I've captured all your points.
Regards, Greg On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 12:28 PM Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I support publication of this draft. > > I have no technical objections to the draft but I do have comments: > > Section 1.1, Acronyms: lists CC and CV which are not used in the > document and does not list VAP which is used in the document. > > Section 2, Page 4: I wasn't sure what "use characteristic information" > meant. Probably "use packet characteristics"? > REQ #4: "forwaded" -> "forwarded" > > The draft requires a 255 TTL are references the General TTL Security > Mechanism but doesn't say anywhere I can see what to do for different > received values of the TTL field. Suggest adding something to Security > Considerations. > > There is a lengthy paragraph that straddles the Page 5, Page 6 > boundary. I had some problems with the grammar in this paragraph. I > have put some suggested changes in the attached. > > Thanks, > Donald > > ps: I am not aware of any IPR claims. > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA > d3e...@gmail.com > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 2:27 AM Sam Aldrin <aldrin.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This email begins a two-week working group last call for > draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-07 > > > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/). > > > > > > > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group > list. If you have read the latest version of the draft but have no comments > and believe it is ready for publication as an informational RFC, please > also indicate so to the WG email list. > > > > > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document, please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > > > > > > > Currently there are no IPR disclosures against this document. > > > > > > > > If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been > disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > > > > > This poll will run until Friday 12th July 2023. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Sam and Matthew > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nvo3 mailing list > > nvo3@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 >
<<< text/html; charset="US-ASCII"; name="draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-08.diff.html": Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
