On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Xuxiaohu <[email protected]> wrote: > I fully agree with Dino's points. Before picking one of the three WG docs as > a candidate to publish, we'd better evaluate whether those already published, > implemented and deployed NVo3 technologies (see below) are good enough from > the TECHNICAL point of view: > Please read Matthew's initial posting on this thread. The question raised is "what are the specific TECHNICAL objections to GUE, VXLAN-GPE, and Geneve". Raising the technical objections as the method to evaluate these proposal is what the AD has asked for and is described in RFC7282. Suggesting VXLAN or eight other protocols on this thread really is not helpful. So do you have any specific technical objections regarding the three proposed protocols in the WG?
Tom _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
