On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 7/26/2016 12:42 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > > ... > > The question is: > > (1) Should the WG move forward with one standards track encap? > > I've heard a lot of concern that we just can't do it, that it's too late, > etc. > > > I don't think it's ever "too late", but I also don't see consensus forming > either. >
It may be that many folks are recovering from IETF and not responding yet. > ... > > We can always flip a coin - if the solutions are technically equivalent > and so is the > support. > > > That defines "random", not "consensus". > It's not a preferred way - but it's a way of breaking a deadlock. Of course, the WG would have to have consensus on that being the decision process. Take a read through RFC 7282. I keep praising it because it gives really good perspectives. > Joe > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
