> - VXLAN-GPE does not appear compatible with VXLAN-GPE. If a VXLAN host 
> receives a VXLAN packet for some protocol other than Ethern the payload will 
> be misinterpreted. A separate port number was required. I assume that a user 
> using VXLAN in HW must upgrade HW to use VXLAN-GPE

Tom, one clarification. Did you really mean VXLAN-GPE is not compatible with 
VXLAN-GPE or did you mean VXLAN?

This is how a VXLAN-GPE encapsulator (an upgraded system) can talk to a VXLAN 
decapsulator (an existing system) with the LISP control-plane:

(1) The encapsulator does a lookup on a MAC address to the mapping system.
(2) What gets retunred is the decapsultor’s IP address and an encapsulation 
format. In this case the encapsulation format is VXLAN.
(3) The VXLAN-GPE supuported encapsulator then encapsulates packets with UDP 
port 4789.

I am told you can do this with BGP as well by negotiating what encapsulations 
are supported.

Dino

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to