Dino, I'm curious - what is your basis for "cost"?
The overheads in these protocols is as low as any other currently in widespread use. Joe On 7/21/2016 11:24 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >> 1) Does anyone have a significant technical objection to selecting Geneve as >> the single NVO3 Standards track document? Please be as concrete and >> detailed as possible as to your technical objection. > I object to Geneve because it will not be a cost-effective solution in all > types of products it will be needed in. > >> 2) Does anyone have a significant technical objection to selecting VXLAN-GPE >> as the single NVO3 Standards track document? Please be as concrete and >> detailed as possible as to your technical objection. > I support VXLAN-GPE because it can work in existing VXLAN deployments in > compatibility mode as well as allowing the introduction of new (already > known) features. > >> 3)Does anyone have a significant technical objection to selecting GUE as the >> single NVO3 Standards track document? Please be as concrete and detailed as >> possible as to your technical objection. > I object to GUE because it will not be a cost-effective solution in all types > of products it will be needed in. > > Dino > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
