> On Nov 6, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am having trouble understanding the conversation. > We have a clear agreement that we are not going to standardize on transport > for NSH. > And even more that we are not going to pick "one". >
I agree. It seems that we are trying to solve a problem that doesn't need to be solved. If an operator wants to use UDP/NSH in their environment, so be it. Similarly, if they chose to use VXLAN-GPE or something else, so be it. NSH doesn't care, and nor should we. > So yes, this draft describes a valid and useful way to transport NSH. there > are many such. > > Yours, > Joel _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
