But the L3 device in the core of a data center  is a router not an open flow 
switch that can arbitrarily match on any field. And this draft is in IETF and 
not ONF.

Thx
SD

From: nvo3 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dacheng Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 6:25 PM
To: Shahram Davari; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

I can give a simple example. A OpenFlow switch can easily be used to support 
this function. But of course it is an example, we do not try to argue that we 
should  use Openflow.

发件人: nvo3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of 
Shahram Davari <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
日期: 2015年11月4日 星期三 上午9:58
至: dacheng de 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
主题: Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

The only text I can see is the following:


“Each network device receives the Path Tracking packet from its
   upstream device, makes a copy of it and passes the copy to its CPU.
“

I don’t see any mechanism being proposed in the draft.

Thx
SD

From: Dacheng Zhang [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 5:53 PM
To: Shahram Davari; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] draft-­-pang-­-nvo3-­-vxlan-­-path-­-detection-­-01

This draft actually proposes a mechanism where the intermediates are required 
to recognize the vxlan oam packets. If this assumption is broken, the solutions 
proposed in this draft may not be effective.

Cheers

Dacheng

发件人: nvo3 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of 
Shahram Davari <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
日期: 2015年11月4日星期三上午9:33
至: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
主题: [nvo3] draft-­‐pang-­‐nvo3-­‐vxlan-­‐path-­‐detection-­‐01

Hi,

This draft needs to address how intermediate L3 routers are going to see these 
VXLAN OAM packets, since L3 routers just do L3 routing and don’t look at the 
payload to see it is VXLAN and then see that these are PD OAM packets. The only 
option I can think of is TTL expiry, otherwise it won’t work, the way it is 
defined now,

Thx
Shahram
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to