On 7/2/15, 11:00 PM, "Joe Touch" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >On 7/1/2015 8:45 PM, Saumya Dikshit (sadikshi) wrote: >> <Saumya> The encapsulation and reassembly mention in 3.1.1 is with >>respect >> to the outer header encapsulation (for Vxlan tunnel encap). >> Frag/reassembly in underlay is performed in context of outer encap which >> is L3 based. That¹s one of the reason Vxlan scores over other >>L2-tunneling >> schema. > >That's good, but then the PTB needs to be interpreted correctly. > >PTB is TB. It isn't "packet larger than I'd like, but I can deal with >it". There is no such signal for the latter. Sure, That¹s what is being conveyed here; for underlay indeed its a PTB (without frag). I believe that it will serve good, if this TB which is generated by any node in the path (overlay or underlay), is not black-holed. > >Joe _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
