Hi, Behcet -

Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Let me say this, sorry Benson, no offense to you but in this list I
hardly see chair reviews, unlike most other WGs.

Just to be clear: I'm not offended. Nor do I intend to offend anybody else. Meaningful and constructive discussion of ideas is always welcome.

I'll take into consideration your comment about providing chairs' reviews. Typically when I call for Adoption my message will indicate that we believe consensus exists. And prior to submission to the IESG both Matthew and I perform careful reviews with the authors, both for editorial purposes as well as to ensure that the draft accurately captures consensus. In between those events, I tend to allow the WG to develop its own consensus rather than influence it. But I will reconsider whether or not the WG would also benefit from more of my technical thoughts during development. Thank you for this feedback.

I noticed that the issue tracker has never been used in nvo3.
Once this draft is submitted as WG draft, I am going to be happy to
provide my technical comments on the issue tracker maybe lead the way.

I don't have a strong opinion about whether the Issue Tracker is helpful or not. I suspect that it will not add any benefit to NVO3 at this time, but I'm willing to reconsider that view.

That being said, whether issues are described in the Tracker or on the mailing list my expectation is that the issue will be meaningful and clearly described. Merely claiming that there is an issue is not adequate by itself. Also, an individual's failure to understand something does not necessarily qualify as an issue.

I would encourage all participants to consider whether or not their feedback is a material issue, that can be clearly described, which would result in constructive discussion. If not, then that feedback may not need to consume WG attention. This is true regardless of whether the issue is posted in Tracker, on the list, etc.

-Benson

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to