On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Benson, > > Joe Touch wrote this on intarea list: > > There is no reason for having the GUE header differentiate between > payload=IPv4 and payload=IPv6. The IP version is addressed by the > version field of the IP header. If GUE encapsulates both type of IP the > same way (and it should), it should NOT differentiate between them in > its (GUE) header. > > > I think the same applies to gpe header. > > Plus the issues on the "NSH" protocol.
Curiously if you look at the nsh draft, Section 3.2, NSH Base Header also has a next protocol field with the same encoding. Anybody understands what is going on? Behcet > > Regards, > > Behcet > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Benson Schliesser > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, Behcet. >> >> Behcet Sarikaya wrote: >>> >>> I was wondering what is NSH in this draft? It is referenced as an >>> unnamed unknown draft from 2014? >> >> >> I believe that NSH refers to the protocol described by draft-ietf-sfc-nsh. >> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh/) >> >> Thank you for reviewing the draft and noticing that the reference was >> outdated. I anticipate that the co-authors will update the text accordingly >> in a future revision. >> >> Cheers, >> -Benson _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
