Thomas I believe that is a reasonable approach as there is consensus to adopt the draft.
Please direct any discussion of these items should occur on the list so that the subsequent version of the document reflects WG consensus. Best regards Matthew On 13/12/2013 13:54, "Thomas Narten" <[email protected]> wrote: >Matthew (and WG): > >There have been some comments raised on the architecure document in >conjunction with the call for adoption. Speaking on behalf of the >design team, we are committed to addressing the issues that have been >raised. > >Indeed, there has also been some proposed text posted to the >list, some followup discussions, and more proposed text is in the >works. Topics include: > > text on combined L3/L2 service > text on Distributed inter-VN gateways > Text on NVE interactions > TTL handling > >Given that those discussions are still ongoing, and we do not have >agreed upon text for all the above, we think it is best to adopt the >document in its original form (without making modifications) and then >revise the document going forward. > >Thomas (and team) > _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
