> > > > > [Lucy] Original subject is about to construct a tenant network > > that > > > > > contain multiple subnets. > > > > > > > > This is a complication that is not desirable as it is bad idea to > > > have > > > > to multiple subnets per VLAN. > > > [Lucy] Agree. That is the reason I don't see EVPN fit it and > propose > > to > > > have a new service type. > > > Do you say that IPVPN-end-system can be used to construct a tenant > > > network that contain multiple subnets? > > > > You could support multiple subnets in one IPVPN-end-system VPN but > this > > is a bad network design. As I said, this is like having multiple > > subnets per VLAN. > [Lucy] Thank you to clarify that again, it is clear to me now. So what > you suggest that a good design is to construct several IPVPN-end-system > VPNs for a tenant network that contain several subnets. may I > understand you correct? >
Yes. The goal of grouping VMs in an IP subnet is, naturally, to match it to a virtual network. Maria _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
