Not aware of IPR On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Henderickx, Wim (Wim) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Not aware of IPR > > On 29/11/2012 19:24, "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Support as is as a co-author > > From: <Bocci>, "Matthew (Matthew)" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday 29 November 2012 18:52 > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [nvo3] Consensus call and IPR check on > draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt > > There have been a number of requests for the WG to adopt > draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt > as a working group draft. There has also been some discussion on the list > and in Atlanta as to whether VM mobility requirements and problem statement > issues should be addressed in a stand alone draft or as a part of the > existing problem statement. There are also a number of other drafts > addressing this issue, so if draft-rekhter is adopted as a stand alone > working group document, then that will provide the base working group > document into which any additional text would be added. > > In order to help the chairs determine how to progress on this issue, > please can you indicate to the list: > > > - Do you support adoption of this draft as-is (yes/no)? > - If no, would you support adoption of this draft with changes, and if > so, what (e.g. more Layer 3 content)? > - If no, should all of the VM mobility problem statement be added to > the NVO3 problem statement draft? > > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies > to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. > If you are on the NVO3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any > IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > This call for consensus will close on Thursday 13th December 2012. > > Best regards > > Matthew and Benson > > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
