Support -- Paul Unbehagen
On Nov 29, 2012, at 3:38 PM, "LASSERRE, MARC (MARC)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Support as is. > > Marc > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [nvo3] Consensus call and IPR check on > draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt > > There have been a number of requests for the WG to adopt > draft-rekhter-nvo3-vm-mobility-issues-03.txt as > a working group draft. There has also been some discussion on the list and > in > Atlanta as to whether VM mobility requirements and problem statement issues > should be addressed in a stand alone draft or as a part of the existing > problem statement. There are also a number of other drafts addressing this > issue, so if draft-rekhter is adopted as a stand alone working group > document, > then that will provide the base working group document into which any > additional text would be added. > > In order to help > the chairs determine how to progress on this issue, please can you indicate > to > the list: > > Do you > support adoption of this draft as-is (yes/no)? > If no, > would you support adoption of this draft with changes, and if so, what > (e.g. > more Layer 3 content)? > If no, should all of the VM mobility problem statement be added to the NVO3 > problem statement draft? > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to > this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR > rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this > email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not be > adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor. > If you are on the NVO3 WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR > that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > This call for consensus will close on Thursday 13th December 2012. > > Best regards > > Matthew and Benson > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
