Hi Anoop,
Indeed I very much agree with you. In fact that is precisely the reason
for wild suggestion two host a real meeting in two locations + allow
remote access.
Coordinating meaningful participation across two locations would be much
easier then across 100 individuals.
R.
Not sure how the video would help, but...
I have attended a WG meeting remotely and found that while
it's mostly possible to follow what is happening, it is almost
impossible to participate meaningfully. Jabber is too slow
because often questions/answers require quick turn around
and at least regular WG meetings move too quickly for that.
For meaningful participation there would have to be an operator
unmuting/muting participants for voice discussion.
Anoop
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Benson,
I have a question .. perhaps no precedence one. Would it be feasible
to have the NVO3 interim meeting on the 20 September in both East and
West US cost locations interconnected by voice + video ?
That way we could I think have a very good opportunity to gather in
both locations without need to travel across US for one day meeting
... I think technology wise this could be done.
Of course remote participation from any other location would be also
possible.
Just a thought ...
Best regards,
R.
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
