> I'm also concerned about the whole "trusted network" thing. I think > that if you're going to continue to hang onto it (and I'd really > rather that you did not), you should probably explain in the document > that one of your starting assumptions is that there are no insider > threats.
isn't that in the mandatory santa claus section? </sarcasm> i have been amazed that, in 2012, i am seeing one document after another document, in many wgs, which makes naive assumptions about security or ignore the issue entirely. if microsoft can absorb the basic security lesson, surely the ietf can. randy _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
