From: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com> Static analysis points out that the cast of bus->major and bus->minor to a signed type in the call to parent_dev_path could result in a negative number. I sincerely doubt we'll see major and minor numbers that large, but let's fix it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com> --- ndctl/lib/libndctl.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ndctl/lib/libndctl.c b/ndctl/lib/libndctl.c index ddbdd9a..f75dbd4 100644 --- a/ndctl/lib/libndctl.c +++ b/ndctl/lib/libndctl.c @@ -710,11 +710,12 @@ NDCTL_EXPORT void ndctl_set_log_priority(struct ndctl_ctx *ctx, int priority) daxctl_set_log_priority(ctx->daxctl_ctx, priority); } -static char *__dev_path(char *type, int major, int minor, int parent) +static char *__dev_path(char *type, unsigned int major, unsigned int minor, + int parent) { char *path, *dev_path; - if (asprintf(&path, "/sys/dev/%s/%d:%d%s", type, major, minor, + if (asprintf(&path, "/sys/dev/%s/%u:%u%s", type, major, minor, parent ? "/device" : "") < 0) return NULL; @@ -723,7 +724,7 @@ static char *__dev_path(char *type, int major, int minor, int parent) return dev_path; } -static char *parent_dev_path(char *type, int major, int minor) +static char *parent_dev_path(char *type, unsigned int major, unsigned int minor) { return __dev_path(type, major, minor, 1); } -- 2.43.0