When there wasn't really any internet to speak of, Win3.1 was an advanced GUI, 
and "640 KB is enough for anybody!"

j/k

:-)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Joey Smith
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 12:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Accessing only a lower level folder in a share


Oh the good old days of Netware!  Reboot server once a year.  


On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Bud Durland wrote:

> [Nostaligia mode on]
> Netware: 
> Right click on target folder
> add user & set permissions
> click OK
> done. No worries about access/visibility of files folders higher in the tree.
> [Nostalgia mode off]
> 
> 
> Bud Durland   |   Director of Information Technology
> Direct: 518.324.4850 | Cell: 518.726.0967 | Fax: 518.561.0017 | 
> [email protected]
> 1 Plant St., Plattsburgh, NY 12901
> Website |  Twitter |  LinkedIn |  YouTube
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Leone
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 11:51
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [NTSysADM] Accessing only a lower level folder in a share
> 
> It's been so long since I've had to do this, I need a check. I'm doing 
> something fundamentally wrong, I think.
> 
> We use groups to set share/ACLs on folders. I got a request to share a 
> 4th level sub-folder with other employees not in the ACL. So what I 
> have is:
> 
> Folder A1 (shared)
> -->>B2
>        -->>C3
>              -->> D4 (this is the one I want to allow access to)
> 
> Now, the share permissions on A1 is for DevelopmentGroup, and the NTFS 
> permissions are the same. Those permissions just flow down to B2, C3 
> and D4 (i.e., normal inheritance).
> 
> Now, I'm pretty sure the only way to allow access to only D4, and not 
> allow access to B2 and C3 or even see files there, is to enable ABE.
> But I've never done that, and am leery of enabling it in production, 
> without a whole more testing and forethought (I shudder to think of 
> all the help desk calls, if I get something wrong).
> 
> Am I correct that only ABE will do what I am thinking of (allow access 
> only to D4 and hide contents of A1, B2, C3)?
> 
> Barring ABE, there's nothing I can do, short of granting a new group 
> access to D4, and living with the consequences?
> 
> Thoughts? At this point, I want to just add the new group to the NTFS 
> permissions of D4 only, and live with the fact that these new group 
> members can see everything higher up.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> NOTE -- This message contains legally privileged and confidential information 
> and is intended only for the individual named.
> If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or 
> copy this e-mail.
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received 
> this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you.
> 
> 
> 





Reply via email to